[North-NV-Greens] Fwd: [usgp-dx] GOP insider: vote fraud in Florida, Ohio (but read with caution) (GlobalResearch.ca)

[Paul Etxeberri]

>
>Voter Fraud in Florida and Ohio:
>Kerry Won the Election by at least 1,7 Million
>Votes
>by Brad Menfil
>
>http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/11/303775.shtml
>27 Nov 2004
>
>GlobalResearch.ca
>3 December 2004
>The URL of this article is:
>http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MEN412A.html
>
>
>Editor's Note:
>
>A word of caution.
>
>While the following text presents evidence which
>is not directly verifiable, Global Research,
>nonetheless, took the decision to bring this
>controversial text to the attention of our
>readers. Moreover, the author's identify is not
>known.
>
>The relevance of this text, should be assessed in
>relation to the large body of documentation and
>research already conducted on electoral fraud in
>America.
>
>In this regard, we refer the reader to Michael
>Keefer's extensive bibliography at:
>http://globalresearch.ca/articles/KEE412A.html
>and
>http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/KEE411A.html
>
>
>*  *  *  *  *
>
>
>Brad Menfil is not my real name. I work for the
>RNC. I fear reprisals if I'm found out.
>
>The truth about this election is this: Florida
>and Ohio had to go for Bush in order for him to
>"win" the election. In reality he lost both
>states. In fact, he did not even win the popular
>vote. He lost the national popular vote by at
>least 1,750,000. This shows you the scale of the
>fraud.
>
>The exit polls were not wrong. Kerry was the
>clear winner, but victory was snatched from him.
>
>Florida first. The 200,000+ margin of victory for
>Bush made this state uncontestable. Everybody
>assumes that even with some fraud, Kerry could
>never have made up the difference in a recount.
>But Kerry actually won by about 750,000 votes.
>The numbers were changed by a computer program
>(in both electronic and scan-tron voting systems)
>called "KerryLite." "KerryLite" of course is not
>actual name of the program. The actual name is
>11-5-18-18 etc. For additional encryption, the
>numbers were jumbled but I'm not sure in which
>order. The numbers replace the letters of the
>alphabet. For example, K is the eleventh letter
>of the alphabet.
>
>So the if-then statement goes something like
>this: "if total true Kerry>total true Bush, Bush
>x 1.04x (.04 is a random number)(total true
>Kerry), total true Bush". The second part of the
>equation takes the total number of votes cast and
>subtracts the new Bush total, subtracts the third
>party totals and leaves the rest for Kerry.
>
>Sometimes the program would also reduce third
>party votes and award them to Bush. And even
>where Bush legitimately won, he was still awarded
>additional votes. The big Democratic counties
>(Broward for example) went to Kerry because it
>had to appear that everything was on the up and
>up. It's interesting to see this unfold. Does
>anybody wonder why the Republican counties were
>mostly counted after the Democratic counties? You
>should wonder, and also know that this was no
>accident. The Bush team had to make up the votes
>as the night went on.
>
>In Ohio, computer voting fraud, vote tossing and
>voter suppression were the main methods. Vote
>tossing was simply the removal of Kerry votes and
>some third party votes. In some areas, the Bush
>vs. Kerry votes were absurd. Nine to one, eight
>to two.
>
>Voter suppression took the form of making voters
>stand in four hour long lines. This of course
>took place in Democratic areas. The simplest
>thing to do was to have too few voting machines.
>Sometimes that's all it takes. People eventually
>lose patience and leave without casting a vote.
>
>In other states such as New Mexico, Nevada, Iowa
>and New Hampshire, Kerry's leads evaporated very
>quickly once the polls were shut down. Kerry only
>won New Hampshire, but barely. As it turned out,
>the lead was 6% for Kerry in that state and not
>enough fraudulent activity took place to flip the
>state to Bush.
>
>So this will all come out and be known to
>everyone. Nothing this massive can be kept a
>secret. You're already beginning to see these
>"irregularities" and the whisper will become a
>roar.
>
>
>For media inquiries: crgeditor at yahoo.com
>
>© Copyright belongs to the author 2004 . For fair
>use only/ pour usage Èquitable seulement.
>
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>_______________________________________________
>Natlcomaffairs mailing list
>To send a message to the list, write to:
>Natlcomaffairs at green.gpus.org
>To unsubscribe or change your list options, go to:
>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/natlcomaffairs
>
>You must know your password to do this.
>
>If you can't figure out how to
>unsubscribe, as a last resort only,
>send a message OFF LIST to
>steveh at wagreens.us
>
>If your state delegation changes, please see:
>http://gp.org/committees/cc/documents/delegate_change.html
>
>For other information about the Coordinating Committee, see:
>http://gp.org/committees/cc/


-- 
Paul Etxeberri

"Forests precede civilizations and deserts follow"   ---Chateaubriand