[NV Greens] Fwd: Re: [GreenAllianceUSA] End the Moratorium on
Dissent
Paul Etxeberri
eusko at greens.org
Sun Feb 27 23:47:22 PST 2005
>
>Best strategy is to go to the roots.
>
>God is not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, only in the
>Confederate Constitution where in the first sentence that apes the
>U.S. Constitution, the concept of "general welfare" is out and God
>is in. Many of the Bush supporters of today are the KuKlux
>Christians of yore.
>
>Historically, over half the pro-slavery tracts written before the
>Civil War were written by evangelicals.
>
>Tony
>
>-------------- Original message from "Allen Butcher"
><allenbutcher80207 at yahoo.com>: --------------
>
>
>>
>>
>> It's Time to End the Moratorium on Dissent begun with 9/11 ... by
>> Affirming a Higher Moral Ideal than that of the Religious Right
>>
>>
>> When the 9/11 tragedy happened there began essentially a moratorium
>> on dissent. The anti-globalization demonstrations and other forms
>> of dissent largely diminished or ended as our government proceeded
>> to engender a war consciousness. The reelection of President Bush
>> was as much a success of the manipulation of fear by our government
>> over our people as it was an assertion of a Right Wing world view.
>> Fear of gays, fear of economic loss/scarcity, fear of attack, fear
>> of loss of freedom, all were and continue to be manipulations of
>> both individual and mass opinion by the Religious Right.
>>
>> The Christian Religious Right has succeeded in asserting itself as
>> essentially the moral authority in America, due in part although not
>> entirely to its influence in the Republican Party, and that party's
>> ideological influence within much of our government. It maintains
>> this hold in part by calling seditious any dissent, from academic
>> expression to street demonstrations, and demonizing affirmations of
>> different forms of spirituality, including aspects of Islam that it
>> hypocritically supports in Judaism, all expressions of Paganism, and
>> multi-faith traditions such as Unitarian Universalism.
>>
>> Breaking this hold over the cultural identity of our country cannot
>> be done simply by political activism. This is the inadequacy of the
>> strategy of the Green Party of the United States. The GPUS's focus
>> upon creating an alternative political institution in America is
>> certainly an important and valuable component of a comprehensive
>> social-cultural change strategy, yet it is not enough for meeting
>> the base of the political Right on its own terms. To stop the
>> wildfire of the Radical Right and end its current monopoly on power
>> requires fighting fire with fire.
>>
>> When the Republican Party bases its moral authority for governance
>> upon a particular spiritual awareness and tradition, mere political
>> and economic challenges to that authority are insufficient. The
>> need is to establish a moral ideal to counter and rise above the
>> Christian Religious Right. Have no doubt that the beginning of such
>> a tradition of a higher moral authority than the Religious Right can
>> begin with small groups of people. It can happen in local Green
>> Parties or any other progressive political organization including
>> those associated with the Democratic Party (and theoretically even
>> the Republican), it can begin in liberal Christian organizations
>> uncomfortable with the self-proclaimed spiritual authority of the
>> Religious Right, it can begin in multi-faith organizations such as
>> the United Religions Initiative (started through the UN, see:
>> http://www.uri.org ), it can begin in Unitarian Universalist
>> Congregations, it can begin in Pagan communities and networks, or
>> outside of any of these existing networks and institutions.
>>
>> Recognizing that America is 80% Christian there may be no doubt that
>> any moral ideal capable of repudiating the Christian Religious Right
>> must include liberal Christianity. In the same way that some
>> Christian organizations have chosen to reinterpret scripture from a
>> justification for the despoliation of nature via the concept
> > of "taking possession of the earth," toward a form of Christian
>> ecology in the ideal of "earth stewardship" as a spiritual
>> imperative (see: http://www.creationspirituality.com ), so also does
>> there need to be a reinterpretation of scripture toward identifying
>> a range of other higher moral ideals than those of the Christian
>> Religious Right. The moral imperatives that we find in ecology,
>> that is the respect and beauty that may be experienced in a
>> symbiotic rather than parasitic relationship between humanity and
>> nature, may be expanded to economic, political and cultural aspects
>> of spiritual expression.
>>
>> Rising above the moral monopoly proclaimed by the Christian
>> Religious Right may involve affirming and advocating primarily one
>> fundamental concept, the doctrine of a "natural law" to which
>> anyone, from common citizens to judges, may appeal.
>>
>> During the Reformation, when a major shift occurred in Western
>> spirituality on the level of the assertion of a "New Age," the
>> Protestant movements drew heavily upon the concept of an individual
>> spiritual awareness, sometimes called the doctrine of the "inner
>> light," affirming that allegiance to authoritarian structures of
>> church and state are unnecessary. The concept, however, is much
>> more ancient, going back to Egyptian mystery religions, and some
>> suggest even earlier, to pre-civilization tribal cultures. The
>> Masonic orders served to bring the concept of the inner light
>> forward to the American Revolution, seen even today in the "radiant
>> eye" imagery of the reverse side of the Great Seal of the United
>> States, as printed on the dollar bill (see:
>> http://www.greatseal.com ). Although this image has been twisted by
>> conspiracy theorists to relate to world domination by
>> an "Illuminati," it's original meaning of divine providence
>> supporting bold new human undertakings remains available to any
>> movement that can substantiate its claim of being founded upon
>> positive spiritual values.
>>
>> There are a number of other spiritual, ecological and cultural
>> concepts that may be included under a general movement based upon
>> natural law. These may include the general concepts of "process
>> theory," "process philosophy" and "process theology," the latter of
>> which may be defined as the "universe is characterized by process
>> and change carried out by the agents of free will" and self-
>> determination (see: http://www.answers.com/Process%20Theology ).
>>
>> Process theology can be seen in the changes in spirituality over
>> time. For example in Christianity there is the transition from the
>> Old Testament to the New Testament, suggesting that there is an
>> ongoing spiritual development of which individuals are a part. The
>> belief that we are now in the "End Times" suggests massive change at
>> this point in history. And we can see parallels with this in a
>> range of other spiritual traditions, from Native American prophecies
>> to the astrological concept of the New Age of Aquarius. The Gaia
>> Hypothesis is a New Age myth suggesting that the planet may be
>> considered a self-regulating living entity, of which humanity must
>> recognize its role as an integral symbiote as opposed to that of a
>> parasite. If we are in a time of tribulations, it is toward getting
>> to the far side of this period into a time characterized by many
>> spiritual traditions as one of sustainability, peace and harmony,
>> for which we need find or establish a trail, an ideological concept,
>> or a cultural paradigm that can carry us to our preferred destiny.
>>
>> It is simply spiritual chauvinism for any religious tradition to
>> claim that they and they alone have the key to that future. As
>> chauvinism of any kind engenders strife and conflict, the true path
>> must be in multi-faith expressions of salvation. If we have
>> objections to the contemporary dominance of the Radical Right over
>> spiritual, political and economic expression and institutions in our
>> culture, it simply remains for individuals to affirm an alternative
>> set of values, explain how they differ from those of the current
> > dominant paradigm, and work to apply them.
>>
>> Today the need for legitimation of government becomes more important
>> given our current era of growing globalization of wealth and power.
>> Individuals must now rely upon their government (local and national)
>> to represent their interests against those of the transnational
>> corporations. This is a difficult proposition given the issues
>> raised in neo-liberalism with such programs as global "free-trade."
>> And if our national government is seen by the people to serve the
>> forces of globalization over the concept of popular sovereignty then
>> it is the policies and office holders of that government that may be
>> charged with sedition and treason.
>>
>> The Princeton University political science professor Paul Sigmund
>> writes, "Modern natural law theory is rationalist, individual, and
>> radical. Natural law in the modern period ... becomes a
>> revolutionary ideology or justification for the transformation of
>> political, economic, and social relationships." (See: Paul
>> Sigmund, "Natural Law in Political Thought," 1971, Winthrop Publ.,
>> Cambridge, MA, p. 53-54.) If fighting fire with fire requires
>> meeting right wing fundamentalism with liberal fundamentalism, then
>> claiming the high moral ground may require setting opposing
>> fundamentalisms on the path of mutually assured philosophical
>> destruction, leaving for all to find in the settling of the dust the
>> essence and purity of values which may be recognized as expressions
>> of natural law.
>>
>> A classic analysis of the problem in governance is the work of by
>> Jurgen Habermas called "Legitimation Crisis." Habermas
>> distinguishes between substantive democracy (also called direct or
>> deep democracy) and formal democracy, and suggests that the latter
>> represents a crisis tendency in advanced capitalism. He explains
>> that formal democratic institutions make decisions largely
>> independent of popular participation through a legitimation process
>> that elicits diffuse mass loyalty among a passive citizenry having
>> only the right to withhold acclamation. (See also: Daniel Hellinger
>> and Dennis R. Judd, "The Democratic Facade," Pacific Grove, CA:
>> Brooks/Cole, 1991.)
>>
>> Generally, corporations are subject to the same threat of
>> withholding of acclamation, in this case by consumers' refusal to
>> patronize them through the organized objections of boycotts. Yet
>> these are after-the-fact remedies, suggesting the need for proactive
>> interventions in order to focus upon structurally avoiding problems
>> as opposed to merely remedying problems.
>>
>> One such proactive intervention is the process of the consensus
>> decision-making in which participation is facilitated before a
>> decision is made, more likely resulting in decisions respecting the
>> views of all involved stakeholders. Along with other methods of
>> encouraging communication, such as through the appropriate use of
>> information technology, consensus process provides an important
>> context as well as tool for the design and management of legitimacy
>> in governance. Its appropriate application requires a decentralized
>> political process, which must balance direct with representative
>> forms of democracy, the use of electoral innovations such
>> as "instant run-off voting," proportional representation and other
>> political structures which enhance the civic skills and methods of
>> political engagement of a population.
>>
>> The concept of natural law provides an ideological foundation for
>> challenging the Religious Right as the term relates to the:
>> * justification for both private and common property in economics,
>> the
>> * affirmation of the individual's right to participation in
>> governance, the
>> * expression of environmental sustainability in our application of
>> technology, and the
>> * integration of spirituality and politics.
>>
>> Through the concept of natural law spiritual, political, economic
>> and social issues may be integrated in one coherent world view,
>> offering the potential for the presentation of natural law as a
>> unified field theory for the design of human society. (For more on
> > natural law see: http://www.culturemagic.org and the downloadable
>> PDF file "Time-Based Economics: A Community-Building Dynamic," page
>> 23, found on the link to:
>> http://www.culturemagic.org/TimeBasedEconomics.html )
>>
>> It will not be easy to supplant the ideological dominance of the
>> Religious Right, yet its own excesses provide opportunities for
>> challenging its hold over our government and our cultural identity.
>> The concept of natural law itself is not an easy one to grasp, yet
>> in that complexity is the potential for not only finding and
>> claiming a high moral ground, yet also for finding a common ground
>> among opposing paradigms. For example, although it remains
>> important to maintain a separation of church and state, the question
>> remains what role spirituality may play in politics, since denying
>> the role of something as important as religion and spirituality
>> cannot result in a stable and effective form of governance as long
>> as this important aspect of culture is denied. A balance must be
>> found between opposing forms of religion and spirituality, and a
>> consensus on the role of religious and spiritual balance in
>> governance must be forged such that the result is less of a
>> parasitism and more of a synergy.
>>
>> Expressions of natural law as a cultural paradigm with the potential
>> for replacing the current ideological hegemony of the Religious
>> Right remains the great opportunity for cultural progressives. For
>> any group of people desiring to end the moratorium on dissent
>> initiated by the 9/11 tragedy, strategizing for action must include
>> the consideration of how to address and confront Christian
>> fundamentalism. For this purpose, and for affirming the values of
>> sustainability, justice and peace there is nothing more fundamental
>> and potentially beneficial than the appropriate application of the
>> concept of natural law.
>>
>> A. Allen Butcher
>> Denver, Colorado
>> February 28, 2005
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> If you support rank-and-file democracy in our politics and our
>>economy, build
>> the Green Alliance. Send $45 dues to P.O. Box 794, Sierra Madre, CA 91024.
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
>Take a look at donorschoose.org, an excellent charitable web site for
>anyone who cares about public education!
>http://us.click.yahoo.com/_OLuKD/8WnJAA/cUmLAA/FdSolB/TM
>--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>If you support rank-and-file democracy in our politics and our
>economy, build the Green Alliance. Send $45 dues to P.O. Box 794,
>Sierra Madre, CA 91024.
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
><*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GreenAllianceUSA/
>
><*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> GreenAllianceUSA-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
>
><*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
--
Paul Etxeberri
"Forests precede civilizations and deserts follow" ---Chateaubriand
More information about the Nvgreen
mailing list